Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016
To
initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency
and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, certain prerequisites must be met.
These
include:
1. The
existence of a default by the corporate debtor,
2. A
debt exceeding the minimum threshold limit, and
3. A
demand notice served by the creditor.
The creditor must also provide evidence of the default and the debt, along with
proof of service of the demand notice.
Once
these conditions are satisfied, the creditor can file an application for CIRP
with the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which will then admit or reject
the application based on its merits.
It's
important to note that CIRP is a legal process that involves various
stakeholders and timelines, and seeking professional advice is recommended.
CIRP Regulation Process:
The
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) introduced in 2016 has brought about
significant changes in how insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings are
conducted in India. One of the key features of the IBC is the Corporate
Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), which is a mechanism for resolving the
insolvency of corporate entities.
In
this article, I will take a closer look at the CIRP regulations under IBC.
The
CIRP is initiated when a company defaults on its debt obligations and is unable
to pay its creditors. The process begins with the filing of an application by a
creditor or the company itself, which is then admitted by the National Company
Law Tribunal (NCLT). Once the application is admitted, a moratorium is imposed
on the company, which prevents any legal action against it by its creditors.
The
CIRP regulations under IBC provide for a timeline of 180 days for the
resolution of the company's insolvency. This can be extended up to a maximum of
270 days, subject to the approval of the NCLT, During this period, a resolution
professional (RP) is appointed to manage the affairs of the company and come up
with a resolution plan.
The
RP is responsible for investigating the company's affairs and identifying potential buyers or investors who can take over the
company. The RP then invites resolution plans from these buyers or investors,
which are evaluated by a committee of creditors (CoC). The CoC consists of all
the financial creditors of the company and is responsible for approving or
rejecting the resolution plan.
If
a resolution plan is approved by the CoC, it is then submitted to the NCLT for
final approval. If the NCLT approves the plan, it becomes binding on all
stakeholders, including the company, its creditors, and its employees. If the
plan is not approved, the company goes into liquidation.
The
CIRP regulations under IBC have been instrumental in resolving the insolvency
of several companies in India. The process is designed to be time-bound and
transparent, which has helped to instill confidence in investors and creditors;
however, there have been some challenges in implementing the CIRP regulations,
including delays in the resolution process and disputes among stakeholders.
In
conclusion, the CIRP regulations under IBC provide a framework for resolving
the insolvency of corporate entities in India. The process is designed to be
time-bound and transparent and involves the appointment of a resolution
professional, the formation of a committee of creditors, and the submission of
a resolution plan to the NCLT for approval, while there have been some
challenges in implementing the CIRP regulations, they have been instrumental in
resolving the insolvency of several companies in India.
Comments
Post a Comment